Thursday, January 28, 2010

Pistons Give Great Effort, Lose

In a sign of just how far things have fallen, the Pistons played one of their better games last night. They hustled. They swarmed on defense. They crashed the glass. Yet, they still did just enough to lose to a mediocre team, at home. Yawn.

It was a strange game. The Pistons shot 58% from the field in the first half but somehow found themselves down by six points. The Grizzlies maintained a comfortable 6-10 point cushion throughout most of the second half until Jason Maxiell took over the game. On both ends of the court, Maxiell dominated. Stuckey's 15-ft jumper with 2:56 to go in the game put the Pistons up 93-91, and the Pistons seemed in control. Unfortunately, it was the last points they would score.

The Pistons missed their final eight shots - many uncontested and/or layups. They also missed 4 of their final 6 free throws. Marc Gasol did not miss any free throws, as he scored Memphis final eight points. Just a few years ago, this game would've been a comfortable win by the Stones, even on an off-night. Yet, this incarnation is like Nate Robertson. They try hard, tease you with good innings, then end up blowing it at the worst times. They're GETL - Good Enough To Lose.

Were there bright spots? Sure. Stuckey and Rip both had double-digit assists. Unfortunately, Stuckey still can't finish at the rim. I've rarely seen an NBA guard who has as much trouble putting away layups. I realize he's often off-balance and swarmed by 6'10 behemoths, but Stuckey is supposed to an NBA-calibre scorer. Put the ball in the hoop already. Jason Maxiell and Ben Wallace were pretty awesome, but where was Austin Daye?

Dear Coach Kuester, last I checked your team was 14 games below .500. You're a lottery team. Why not play the rookie? Is Tayshaun Price that insistent on minutes?

The Pistons continue their dreadful home stand against the Heat on Friday. Can't wait.

End of an Era
Coming off one of the worst losses of their season, the Red Wings put up zero fight in a 5-2 loss at Minnesota. The loss knocked the Wings out of the final playoff spot and moved Minnesota within 3 points. The Wings have now lost three in a row, and are 3 games below .500 for the season.

Chris Osgood let three goals in on the first six shots. If he doesn't step it up soon, Holland should consider calling up Daniel Larsson from Grand Rapids. Jimmy Howard is playing well in net, but he can't shoulder the entire burden. The Wings need a backup to spell him on back-to-backs. And that 2nd string goalie should not guarantee a win for the opposition. Is that too much to ask?

Suffice it to say, the Wings are in trouble. Gone are the days of dominant puck possession and beautiful tic-tac-toe goals. No more suffocating defense that limits the opponents to under 20 shots. This is a team fighting for the final spot in the playoffs. They're a middle-of-the-road NHL squad with below average scoring. Folks in town seem to believe their fortunes will turn around when the injured players return. I tend to disagree. The team is what it is. They've been playing poorly all season, regardless of who's on the ice. Hoping for a massive turnaround is akin to hoping Magglio, Guillen, and Robertson will return to form. It's a hope based on no tangible evidence. Their glory days are long gone. The recent evidence reveals a team that can't string together three wins in a row. They're mediocre. A non-threat.

But all is not lost. They have talent in the farm system. 18-year old Thomas Tater gives us hope at Grand Rapids. Click here for an update. The article says Tater is five years away from contributing. What can they do in the meantime? My thinking is that they would benefit greatly from a two-way center. When Filppula returned, the Wings puck possession increased dramatically. Now Filppula is no world-beater, but he sees the ice well and is an above-average puck handler and skater. If the Wings could pick up one more Filppula (or better) talent, I think they'd see a world of difference in their ability to control the game.

Those that saw my recent +/- stats may have noticed that the top line players (Datsyuk and Zetterberg) despite their sub-par seasons still have the best ratings. The 4th liners (Abdelkader, Leino) have the worst. One key acquisition could change all that. But, how could they attain one more player? I say they consider trading Jonathan Ericsson or Brad Stuart. Both players will be in high demand come the trade deadline. Most playoff teams want to shore up their defense with rugged blue-liners who can contribute on the power play. Nobody is going to want Meech or Lebda. But they will want Ericsson or Stuart. My guess is that a team like Colorado or Chicago would be willing to part with a young center (like Ryan O'Reilly).

The Red Wings' system is predicated on puck control, as the Versus announcers repeated ad nauseum on Monday. As a result, they're more reliant upon centerman than defensemen - unlike, say, Anaheim or New Jersey. The Wings do have a wealth of talent on the blue-line, even with the potential departure of Nick Lidstrom in a few years (gulp). A core of Kronwall, Rafalski, and one of Ericsson/Stuart should suffice, if they have defensive-minded forwards. I imagine most fans would gasp at the prospect of trading away Ericsson, but he's the exact chip piece that could lead to a true talent. The Wings are built from the forwards on down, while most teams are built from the goalie on up. Shop Ericsson and see who bites. And if Anaheim will consider parting with Getzlaf, throw in Datsyuk for good measure.

7 comments:

  1. And lucky us. Stuart has a shoulder injury!

    ...and the hits just keep on comming.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought of this after reading the Red Wings Suck posting, but figured I'd reply here...

    One consistent result this season (and going back to June) is a collapse at the end of the game. Why is this?

    The most common description of the Red Wings has become "professional". They have been a model franchise where excellence has been the expectation. That's not at all a bad thing, but I think the team has become a victim of its own success.

    The core of the team, including the current captain, were seasoned in the 90's where the system was put in place by Scotty Bowman, and the leadership was provided by fiery North Americans (Ciccareli, Shanahan, McCarty) and the greatest team captain of all time (sorry Messier, I'm going with Stevie Y).

    The current team, while led by one of the stalwarts from the previous era (Captain Nic), does not have that same core. Draper and Maltby are there, but I'm betting they don't have the same influence that Shanny, et al had over the team. Lidstrom is a phenomenal player, but I'm thinking that his leadership style doesn't have the same locker room presence as the Captain.

    If I was Don Cherry, I'd be pointing at European softness. I won't call it softness, but there is a passion that is lacking. The professionalism has been a thing of beauty, but without the grit of years past, we lose it at crunch time. We're missing hard-nosed leadership. It's what wins games in the final two minutes (and the play-offs).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ugh. I hadn't seen that. Geez. Well, I guess he's much less trade-able now. Perhaps it'll heal by the trade deadline???

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ John,
    Jeremy Roenick foresaw the decline of the Wings before the season, claiming they've just played too much hockey. Two straight seasons of extended playoff runs may have caught up to them. That may also impact their energy and passion throughout the full 60 minutes.

    I suppose they're only human.

    By the same token, the drive, energy, and passion may be rekindled post Olympic break.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't know about this Euro-softness. I don't think anyone would say that Franzen or Homer don't have the grit. Having said that...when your grittiest player is 38 (Brad May) and clocks in less than 10 minutes of ice time...you got some problems. You just don't hear the stand-by guys doing what they're supposed to do. Its been a long time since you heard Cleary being called out in the game as the difference maker. Or, geez, I usually don't even know who's on the ice because I can't tell anymore.

    But its the same with the Pistons. Get back on D or sit down.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fair point about 2 extended playoff runs being tiring, but somehow the Penguins are still winning.

    I don't think the team is soft -- afraid that came across wrong. I think they don't have the same types of leaders as they did -- or the top teams now have. I don't see Pav or Hank getting in someone's grill quite like I could see Crosby or Ovechkin.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete